1952 Allard K2 vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | Allard | Holden |
Model | K2 | UTE |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |