1952 Allard K2 vs. 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera
To start off, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera (256 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2.
Because 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera | |
| Make | Allard | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | K2 | Brera |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1380 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2710 mm |
