1952 Allard K2 vs. 2010 Honda Civic
To start off, 2010 Honda Civic is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Civic (201 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Civic weights approximately 105 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 2010 Honda Civic | |
Make | Allard | Honda |
Model | K2 | Civic |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1305 kg |