1952 Allard K3 vs. 2009 Nissan 370Z
To start off, 2009 Nissan 370Z is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,697 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan 370Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 370Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1952 Allard K3. (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 370Z should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan 370Z (270 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard K3. (218 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan 370Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard K3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 2009 Nissan 370Z | |
| Make | Allard | Nissan |
| Model | K3 | 370Z |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3697 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 327 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1860 mm |
