1952 Allard Safari vs. 2004 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2004 GMC Sierra is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Sierra (300 HP) has 215 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Sierra weights approximately 806 kg more than 1952 Allard Safari. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Sierra (488 Nm) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard Safari. (203 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard Safari.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard Safari | 2004 GMC Sierra | |
| Make | Allard | GMC |
| Model | Safari | Sierra |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 5965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 300 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 488 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 102.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.1:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 2282 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 129 L |
