1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1951 DKW F 89
To start off, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 620 kg more than 1951 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1951 DKW F 89 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | DKW |
| Model | Tickford | F 89 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 684 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1580 mm |
