1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 230 kg more than 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Studebaker |
| Model | Tickford | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1959 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 2779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2980 mm |
