1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 680 kg more than 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Tickford | Pajero |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1100 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1400 mm |
