1952 BMW 340 vs. 1991 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1991 Lotus Elan is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 BMW 340 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 107 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 BMW 340 weights approximately 253 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Because 1952 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 1991 Lotus Elan | |
Make | BMW | Lotus |
Model | 340 | Elan |
Year Released | 1952 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 160 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 997 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2260 mm |