1952 Buick 40 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1959 Cadillac 62 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 490 kg more than 1952 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Buick 40 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | 40 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3310 mm |
