1952 Buick 40 vs. 1990 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 1990 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Chevrolet Suburban (209 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40.
Because 1990 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Chevrolet Suburban (407 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1990 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 1990 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | 40 | Suburban |
Year Released | 1952 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 5733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 209 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 407 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3300 mm |