1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (167 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe weights approximately 94 kg more than 2013 Mazda 3.
Because 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | DeLuxe | 3 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3546 cc | 2489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 167 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 100 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1397 kg | 1303 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4595 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1755 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 55 L |
