1952 DKW F 89 vs. 2011 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2011 Fiat Bravo is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,368 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Fiat Bravo (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 370 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 DKW F 89 | 2011 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | DKW | Fiat |
| Model | F 89 | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 1368 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1800 mm |
