1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2010 Honda Accord
To start off, 2010 Honda Accord is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Accord (190 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 40 kg more than 2010 Honda Accord.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford Crestline | 2010 Honda Accord | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Crestline | Accord |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4849 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1849 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2741 mm |