1952 Holden FX vs. 1954 Maserati 250
To start off, 1954 Maserati 250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Maserati 250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Maserati 250 (267 HP) has 216 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Maserati 250 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 300 kg more than 1954 Maserati 250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Holden FX | 1954 Maserati 250 | |
| Make | Holden | Maserati |
| Model | FX | 250 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 267 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 670 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2290 mm |
