1952 Holden FX vs. 1973 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt (72 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 60 kg more than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 1973 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | FX | Colt |
Year Released | 1952 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2360 mm |