1952 Holden FX vs. 1990 Peugeot 309

To start off, 1990 Peugeot 309 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Peugeot 309 (91 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Peugeot 309 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 80 kg more than 1990 Peugeot 309.

Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Peugeot 309, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Peugeot 309. (135 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Peugeot 309. 1990 Peugeot 309 has automatic transmission and 1952 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1952 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1990 Peugeot 309 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: