1952 Holden FX vs. 2000 Tata E
To start off, 2000 Tata E is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Tata E (148 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Tata E should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Tata E weights approximately 400 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Tata E (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Tata E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Holden FX | 2000 Tata E | |
Make | Holden | Tata |
Model | FX | E |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2810 mm |