1952 Holden FX vs. 2011 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2011 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Saab 03-Sep (180 HP) has 129 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Saab 03-Sep (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Holden FX | 2011 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | Holden | Saab |
| Model | FX | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 180 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
