1952 Hudson Hornet vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Hudson Hornet (144 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1952 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Hudson Hornet | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Hudson | Ford |
Model | Hornet | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4810 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2490 mm |