1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda RX-7. (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 1986 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 230 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2430 mm |