1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1998 Kia Elan
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1998 Kia Elan. (151 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Elan.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 1998 Kia Elan | |
Make | Jaguar | Kia |
Model | XK | Elan |
Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 151 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 186 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2270 mm |