1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Kia |
| Model | XK | K2700 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2665 cc |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4150 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 94.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 95 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1530 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |
