1952 Riley RM A vs. 2011 Volvo S80
To start off, 2011 Volvo S80 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo S80 weights approximately 374 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 1952 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Volvo S80 has automatic transmission and 1952 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1952 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Volvo S80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Riley RM A | 2011 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Riley | Volvo |
| Model | RM A | S80 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1609 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1864 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2776 mm |
