1952 Talbot Baby vs. 1961 Triumph TR3
To start off, 1961 Triumph TR3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Baby (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1961 Triumph TR3. (101 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 1961 Triumph TR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 746 kg more than 1961 Triumph TR3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Talbot Baby | 1961 Triumph TR3 | |
| Make | Talbot | Triumph |
| Model | Baby | TR3 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1961 |
| Engine Size | 2690 cc | 2138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 904 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2240 mm |
