1953 Austin A 30 vs. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo
To start off, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 802 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin A 30 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1953 Austin A 30 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Austin A 30. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo has automatic transmission and 1953 Austin A 30 has manual transmission. 1953 Austin A 30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin A 30 | 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo | |
| Make | Austin | Pininfarina |
| Model | A 30 | Metrocubo |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 802 cc | 505 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 28 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
