1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E (161 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 118 kg more than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E (240 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2002 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Sports Convertible | E |
Year Released | 1953 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2860 mm |