1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Because 1953 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | 12 M | Matrix |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1171 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4394 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2601 mm |