1953 Jaguar XK vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1953 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1953 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 211 kg more than 1953 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jaguar XK (291 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (266 Nm). This means 1953 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jaguar XK | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | Tribute |
Year Released | 1953 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 291 Nm | 266 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 80 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1506 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 62 L |