1953 Toyota Super vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1996 Honda CR-V is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Toyota Super. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Toyota Super would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda CR-V (128 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1953 Toyota Super. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1953 Toyota Super.
Because 1996 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Toyota Super. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Toyota Super | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Toyota | Honda |
| Model | Super | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 128 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
