1954 AC Aceca vs. 2001 Holden Maloo
To start off, 2001 Holden Maloo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 AC Aceca | 2001 Holden Maloo | |
| Make | AC | Holden |
| Model | Aceca | Maloo |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
