1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1994 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1994 Ford Fairlane is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1994 Ford Fairlane. (205 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 630 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1994 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | 6C | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 3983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 205 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 92.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 99.3 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5230 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2930 mm |
