1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2001 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2001 Toyota Condor is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Condor. (88 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Condor weights approximately 410 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2001 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
| Model | 6C | Condor |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1812 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 88 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 78 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1360 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 70 L |
