1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2002 Ford F-250
To start off, 2002 Ford F-250 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2002 Ford F-250. (256 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford F-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1400 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2002 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Ford F-250 has automatic transmission and 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Ford F-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2002 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 6C | F-250 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 2350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 3490 mm |