1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2003 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2003 Subaru Outback is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2003 Subaru Outback. (154 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru Outback. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Subaru Outback weights approximately 565 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2003 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2003 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Subaru |
| Model | 6C | Outback |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2456 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 99.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 79 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2660 mm |
