1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2003 Volvo V50. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo V50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo V50 weights approximately 748 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | 6C | V50 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 83.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1698 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 62 L |