1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3.
Because 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 6C | 3 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 55 L |