1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 1990 Pontiac Trans Am is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1990 Pontiac Trans Am. (235 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1990 Pontiac Trans Am. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 319 kg more than 1990 Pontiac Trans Am. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 1990 Pontiac Trans Am | |
Make | Cadillac | Pontiac |
Model | 62 | Trans Am |
Year Released | 1954 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 5733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 235 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1681 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2570 mm |