1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia RIO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia RIO (136 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | 12 M | RIO |
Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4045 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2570 mm |