1954 Isuzu Minx vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,439 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt (70 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 40 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1954 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Isuzu Minx | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Isuzu | Mitsubishi |
Model | Minx | Colt |
Year Released | 1954 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2390 mm |