1954 Riley RM A vs. 2012 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2012 Nissan Navara is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Navara is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Riley RM A | 2012 Nissan Navara | |
| Make | Riley | Nissan |
| Model | RM A | Navara |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3210 mm |
