1954 Saab 94 vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1966 Triumph 2000 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Saab 94. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Saab 94 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1954 Saab 94. (57 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1954 Saab 94. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 666 kg more than 1954 Saab 94. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Saab 94. (85 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Saab 94.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Saab 94 | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Saab | Triumph |
| Model | 94 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 504 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |
