1954 Singer Hunter vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Singer Hunter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volkswagen Polo (63 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1954 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1954 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Singer Hunter weights approximately 55 kg more than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1954 Singer Hunter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Singer Hunter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Singer Hunter | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Singer | Volkswagen |
| Model | Hunter | Polo |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2470 mm |
