1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2008 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1184 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1955 Abarth 209 2008 Cadillac CTS
Make Abarth Cadillac
Model 209 CTS
Year Released 1955 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1087 cc 3564 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 65 HP 307 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 68 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 74.9 mm 85.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 11.3:1
Top Speed 180 km/hour 249 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 610 kg 1794 kg
Vehicle Length 3630 mm 4870 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 950 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2110 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 27 L 68 L