1955 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 2002 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey 100. (132 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 767 kg more than 1955 Austin-Healey 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin-Healey 100. (228 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin-Healey 100. 2002 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1955 Austin-Healey 100 has manual transmission. 1955 Austin-Healey 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1955 Austin-Healey 100 2002 Cadillac CTS
Make Austin-Healey Cadillac
Model 100 CTS
Year Released 1955 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2658 cc 3173 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 132 HP 220 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 228 Nm 296 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.3 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 111.1 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 851 kg 1618 kg
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1250 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2900 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 109 L 66 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]