1955 Buick 40 vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Buick 40 (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (120 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Buick 40 weights approximately 239 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (305 Nm). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Buick | Oldsmobile |
Model | 40 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1955 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 4343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 305 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1486 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2750 mm |