1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | 62 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1955 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 1714 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2460 mm |