1955 Riley RM A vs. 2001 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 2001 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Saab 05-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Saab 05-Sep weights approximately 249 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Because 1955 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Saab 05-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Saab 05-Sep has automatic transmission and 1955 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1955 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Saab 05-Sep will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Riley RM A | 2001 Saab 05-Sep | |
Make | Riley | Saab |
Model | RM A | 05-Sep |
Year Released | 1955 | 2001 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2710 mm |