1955 Riley RM A vs. 2004 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2004 Toyota Corolla is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Riley RM A weights approximately 46 kg more than 2004 Toyota Corolla.
Because 1955 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Corolla, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Riley RM A | 2004 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Riley | Toyota |
| Model | RM A | Corolla |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2800 mm |
