1955 Riley RM A vs. 2012 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2012 Fiat Croma is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fiat Croma weights approximately 359 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Because 1955 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Riley RM A | 2012 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Riley | Fiat |
Model | RM A | Croma |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 1595 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2710 mm |